A Survey on Layout Implementation and Analysis of Different SRAM Cell Topologies
Because powered widgets are frequently used, the primary goal of electronics is to design low-power devices. Because of its applications in low-energy computing, memory cell operation with low voltage consumption has become a major interest in memory cell design. Because of specification changes in scaled methodologies, the only critical method for the success of low-voltage SRAM design is the stable operation of SRAM. The traditional SRAM cell enables high-density and fast differential sensing but suffers from semi-selective and read-risk issues. The simulation results show that the proposed design provides the fastest read operation and overall power delay product optimization. Compared to the current topologies of 6T, 8T, and 10T, while a traditional SRAM cell solves the reading disruption problem, previous strategies for solving these problems have been ineffective due to low efficiency, data-dependent leakage, and high energy per connection. Our primary goal is to reduce power consumption, improve read performance, and reduce the area and power of the proposed design cell work. The proposed leakage reduction design circuit has been implemented on the micro-wind tool. Delay and power consumption are important factors in memory cell performance. The primary goal of this project is to create a low-power SRAM cell.
. Gupta D. C., Raman A. 2012. “Analysis of leakage current reduction techniques in SRAM cell in 90 nm CMOS technology”, IJCA, 50(19).
. Singh, Jawar, Saraju P. Mohanty, and Dhiraj K. Pradhan. Robust SRAM designs and analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
. Joshi, S., &Alabawi, U. (2017). Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM. Journal of Nanotechnology, 2017, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2017/4575013
. S. Saxena and R. Mehra, “Low-power and high-speed 13T SRAM cell using FinFETs,” IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, 2017
. Wang, H. An, Q. Zhang, H. S. Kim, D. Blaauw and D. Sylvester, “1.03pW/b Ultra-Low Leakage Voltage-Stacked SRAM for Intelligent Edge Processors,” IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2020.
. K. Takeda, Y. Hagihara, Y. Aimoto, M. Nomura, Y. Nakazawa, T. Ishii and H. Kobatake, “A Read-Static-Noise-Margin-Free SRAM Cell for Low-VDD and High-Speed Applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2006.
. Mishra S., Dubey A., Singh T.S., and Akashe S. (2012). Design and simulation of high-level low power 7T SRAM cell using various process & circuit techniques, in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing Computing and Control.
. D. Mittal, V. K. Tomar, “Performance Evaluation of 6T, 7T, 8T, and 9T SRAM cell Topologies at 90 nm Technology Node”, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies, Kharagpur, India, 1-3 July 2020, pp. 1-4.
. C. Yu, M. Shiau, “Single-Port Five-Transistor SRAM Cell with Reduced Leakage Current in Standby”, International Journal of VLSI Design & Communication Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2016, pp. 1-11.
. Singh S, Arora N, Gupta N, Suthar M. Leakage reduction in differential l0T SRAM cell using gated VDD control technique. In: International conference on computing, electronics and electrical technologies; 2012. p. 610–4.
. I. Giannopoulos et al., “8-bit precision in-memory multiplication with projected phase-change memory,” in IEDM Tech. Dig., Dec. 2018, pp. 27.7.1–27.7.4.
. A. Chen, “A comprehensive crossbar array model with solutions for line resistance and nonlinear device characteristics,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1318–1326, Apr. 2013.
. J. Zhang, Z. Wang, and N. Verma, “In-memory computation of a machine-learning classifier in a standard 6T SRAM array,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 915–924, Apr. 2017.
. A. Jaiswal, I. Chakraborty, A. Agrawal, and K. Roy, “8T SRAM cell as a multi-bit dot-product engine for beyond von Neumann computing,” IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2556–2567, Nov. 2019.